TLS 1.0 by region: who's ahead of the web, who's behind

Share of deep-scanned websites accepting the deprecated protocol (lower is better).

web average = 34.9%Unknown: 42.6; +7.8pp vs web average = 34.9% (worse); n=303815 Unknown +7.8ppAsia: 37.9; +3pp vs web average = 34.9% (worse); n=174632 Asia +3ppMiddle East: 35.9; +1pp vs web average = 34.9% (worse); n=23432 Middle East +1ppEurope: 31.9; −3pp vs web average = 34.9% (better); n=259702 Europe −3ppSouth America: 31.8; −3.1pp vs web average = 34.9% (better); n=35716 South America −3.1ppAfrica: 31.2; −3.7pp vs web average = 34.9% (better); n=11155 Africa −3.7ppNorth America: 23.1; −11.8pp vs web average = 34.9% (better); n=150932 North America −11.8ppOceania: 20.6; −14.3pp vs web average = 34.9% (better); n=14046 Oceania −14.3pp
Better than benchmarkWorse than benchmark

Denominator: deep-scanned websites · n per cohort in the table

Oceania has the least TLS 1.0 at 20.6%; Unknown the most at 42.6%.

View as table
SliceSharevs benchmarkn
Unknown42.6%+7.8pp303,815
Asia37.9%+3pp174,632
Middle East35.9%+1pp23,432
Europe31.9%−3pp259,702
South America31.8%−3.1pp35,716
Africa31.2%−3.7pp11,155
North America23.1%−11.8pp150,932
Oceania20.6%−14.3pp14,046

Source: GeoTrust Research — The State of SSL/TLS, October 2026